Variety - Where are the Family Films

Posted by Jeff Labels: ,

Variety has an article on the lack of Family Friendly Films this year at the box office.

The lack of kid-friendly fare — which is exacerbated by the absence of the customary Pixar release — is one factor prompting some box office analysts to predict a softer summer domestically. It’s going to be tough for the summer to top last year’s record $4.75 billion. But the family drought may leave room for slightly older-skewing films to overperform in the family segment. Among these: Disney’s “Maleficent,” the retelling of the classic fairy tale “Sleeping Beauty” from the perspective of its villainous witch; Relativity Media’s PG-rated sci-fi tale “Earth to Echo”; and Marvel offerings including “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” and “Guardians of the Galaxy.”

Those that read the previous version of the blog know I have speculated on how this lack of films in this particular genre effects everything from total summer box office to individuals movies or potentially turning How to train your Dragon 2 into the years first and only billion dollar movie.  

Star Wars: The Ancient Fear

Posted by Jeff Labels: ,

A name has been floated....

The name suggests that Max von Sydow is playing the films principal villain with a rumor that his name is Darth Plagueis.  

The rumor circling the web is the Darth Plagueis is a "retired" Syth Lord who converted Palpatine to the Dark Side and then disappeared.   With the short lived empire in flames he has returned. 

What's going on with Sony Pictures/Avi Arad and Spider-Man

Posted by Jeff Labels: ,

In the last four days Avi Arad, the producer for the Spider-Man, has lashed out at the media, written an open letter to BusinessWeek (or more accurately released the letter), published another commentary about how he was the man in the Marvel Universe, stated that Spider-Man would need to be the Central Character in a Avengers crossover movie and out right has dissed everyone else. 
 
All of this at a time when he should be promoting his latest movie The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
 
What's going on?
Is Avi attempting to divert attention from the lack luster performance of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 at the box office?
 
Back in December Columbia Pictures President Doug Belgrad announced plans for several Spider-Man spin off movies, including Venom and the Sinister Six. 
“The Spider-Man film franchise is one of our studio’s greatest assets. We are thrilled with the creative team we have assembled to delve more deeply into the world that Marc, Avi and Matt have begun to explore in The Amazing Spider-Man and The Amazing Spider-Man 2. We believe that Marc, Alex, and Drew have uniquely exciting visions for how to expand the Spider-Man universe in each of these upcoming films.”
 
A few moments later an executive from Sony Pictures added:
Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, Jeff Pinkner, Ed Solomon, and Drew Goddard will collaborate on overseeing the “developing story over several films” “[They] have formed a franchise brain trust to expand the universe for the brand and to develop a continuous tone and thread throughout the films,” in conjunction with producers Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach and director Marc Webb (The Amazing Spider-Man, The Amazing Spider-Man 2). 
Kurtzman & Orci & Solomon will write Venom, with Kurtzman directing, while Goddard will write and possibly direct Sinister Six. 
Back in December I wondered what was up with the new blood. 
Ed Solomon is an experienced Hollywood writer; Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure, Men in Black, Super Mario Brothers.   Not that his writing is Shakespeare by any means but Bill & Ted and Men in Black were both successful films.   
Jeff Pinkner is another somewhat successful writer who was brought in towards the end of development of TASM 2, replacing James Vanderbilt (checking my sources on that).
 
Shortly before the announcement Sony Pictures had announced a shake up of their upper management with a goal of improving the quality of the pictures they release, per new co-president Micael De Luca.   This lead me to postulate that those individuals at Sony and possibly Doug Belgrad were disappointed with the first cuts of The Amazing Spider-Man 2.  
 
Looking back today at almost looks that Sony was attempting to jump start the hype machine.  Which is surprising considering that the first trailer was released on December 5.  Something else is a foot.
 
It was another quiet statement by Doug Belgrad back in December that caught my attention, lost amongst the chatter of Venom and Sinister Six, I cannot find the exact link at the time but the gist of the comment was Sony would be happy if TASM2 equaled TASM in box office sales.  That's back in December, maybe January time frame.   Equal ticket sales revenue to me would be disappointment in my opinion, with increased revenue for Imax and 3D premium tickets.   That would be an indicator that fewer butts were in the seats. 
 
When I ran my Box Office projections I predicted a terrible open weekend for TASM2 and Box Office Revenue off by 10% over TASM.    If you factor in that TASM and Spider-Man 2 both opened on a weekday properly (which I didn't when creating my projection) it's clear TASM2 had the weakest opening (after adjusting for inflation). 
While TASM2 was higher than my projection for opening weekend, it was at everyone else's bottom end or even bellow their bottom.   Variety suggested that $115 was as strong possibility. 
What's worse is the weekday ticket sales are off by almost 24%...  
If it continues on this pattern it may only hit $160 Million Domestically.   While I still believe that $190 is probably the end point I guess that everyone needs to wonder if $160 which seemed impossible three weeks ago is possible?
There are already early Box Office Estimates for the upcoming weekend (May 9-11) that put The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in second place for the weekend.
 
For Sony this is a HUGE issue, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is their only Tent Pole film of the summer season.   $160 Domestically and $500 internationally only generates about $400 Million for Sony, which $220 to $250 will cover the cost of production of TASM2.  That also means that Sony Blu-Ray DVD Release sales are expected to be well below projections.
 
So with The Amazing Spider-Man in theaters and Avi Arad losing his cool, what the heck is going on.
 
Option 1) - Sony is looking to expand their Spider-Man world allowing it to create a Tent-Pole film every year.  
Option 2) - Sony / Columbia Pictures is looking to minimize or lessen Avi Arad control
Option 3) - Sony is in negotiations or wants to sell back the Spider-Man license to Marvel studios and is looking to enhance its value.
Option 4) - Avi has simply lost control as he becomes less relevant.
 
and of course Option 5) - All of the Above.
 
Sony Pictures and its subsidiaries own a lot of interesting movie rights, the problem is many or most aren't really Tent Pole films with built in audiences.  Other then the Bond Franchise what do they have; Popeye the Sailor, Smurfs, Hotel Transylvania, 21 Jump Street, and ...   Okay you see the problem. 
Will focusing on Villains actually work, all eyes are this summer's release of Maleficent with Angelina Jolie in the title role of supreme bad fairy in the Sleeping Beauty fairytale.  There are two problems with using this as a comparison, 2014 is extremely devoid of competition for young adult - typically female targeted - movies.   It could rack up huge ticket sales because there isn't anything else for people to go see.   Second the rumor is the third act of the movie has Maleficent returning to the side of good, you know redemption.    
 
While Avi Arad had great success at Marvel - movies he was directly involved with earned a couple billion dollars at the box office, but how much was he in control of each one, X-Men, Blade, Spider-Man...   He has "complete" control of "The Amazing Spider-Man" series and the numbers aren't good for what is being invested into the movie.   Could a Michael De Luca, President of Production at Sony Pictures, be trying to bring a fresh perspective to the Spider-Man Universe?
 
I have long postulated that Sony is attempting to position the IP for sale back to Marvel.   A number around $2 Billion (that's with a B) has been mentioned in multiple articles on the topic.  To me, even today, the timing doesn't seem right.  But lets be honest if TASM2 only grosses $160 million domestically the sale would be too late for Sony and the value of the property would be greatly diminished.  How much so, an account friend of mine suggested as much as $500 million (from $2.3 Billion to $1.8 Billion). 
 
It's also possible that Avi Arad, a man from all descriptions is extremely egotistical, self-centered, type A personality, has simply lost it as his works are becoming less relevant to the Marvel Universe.   Honestly his work did bring us the modern Marvel Universe to film, yes he did save marvel's but in 1998, but that was 20 years ago, Bratz has bombed in the theater.   
An unnamed executive from New Line Cinema has flat out called him a Liar and Cheat.   Others have suggested right now he is willing to say anything to save his butt.
 
The final possibility is that all of the other options are in play.   Sony needs a solid Tent Pole film something that can bring in $200 million over budget consistently to help the bottom line, TASM2 isn't working that way at the moment.  So how do you improve quality, fresh eyes, bring in Solomon and Pinkner, both with little connection to Avi Arad.   Having Spider-Man appear in a crossover film (as well as Oscorp) appear in Avengers will have to help the box office, but Avi against it.   Will expanding the universe be worth while, if...  
 
In the end I wouldn't be completely shocked if the franchise was sold to Marvel, but I still think Sony would need something to replace it on the schedule first.  I wouldn't be shocked to hear the Avi is going into a more retirement like role and someone else is appointed to take the lead.   I wouldn't be shocked to see Avi retain control and TASM3 make $150 million either.

X-Men: Days of Future Past - "Who are You?" - Clip

Posted by Jeff Labels: , ,

The film clip that was shown in the end credits of The Amazing Spider-Man 2.

Avi Arad Speaks

Posted by Jeff Labels: ,

Good morning Devin.  
As usual you manage to disappoint me with your false statements. I am sure you were told by Marvel that I resigned over the self-financing strategy. It is about time for a reporter like you to do your homework and check the facts. It will sound arrogant to you, but I single handedly put together the Marvel slate. Read it carefully and you will notice the natural progression of the character's design to get to where we are today.
 You should reach out to Merill Lynch and Ambac Insurance and to our international partners that came on board based on my track record. Our financial partners counted on my reputation. I had to work very hard to convert the doubters. They trusted me and without Iron Man this article would have not been written. Iron Man was not even in the original slate. I knew that we needed it so I set out to get it back from Newline and the rest is history.
 Our financing would have never happened without me reaching out to Brad Grey to make a distribution deal that will give you a corporate guarantee. Other people in Marvel worked for many months with Universal and could not reach a deal. I got tired of waiting and went to Brad. The deal was done in days, successful for both companies. The big presentation to financial institutions and insurance companies took place on the Paramount lot. I was the presenter and it worked. Does this sound to you like someone who disagreed with the strategy to make our own movies?
 I have forgiven Kevin for following orders and taking the credit, but he had no choice. Shame on you for kowtowing to your business gods. I have given up on journalistic integrity. You called me to talk about Kevin and I gave you the most true and glowing account on someone that I love and respect. Share your notes otherwise you just wasted my time. I will share this letter with other papers and your management to demonstrate the unprofessional self-serving work this reporter demonstrated.

Avi Arad responding to Devin Leonard's article in Business Week Magazine, about the Man who Saved Marvel.

Wow, first thing I have to say is where the heck is the breaks in that wall of text.  (Edit, thanks to BusinessWeek who released the text as well.)   The Email was provided to a French Magazine who has now gotten permission to publish it from Avi Arad.

I'm going to take a few moments and comment here on a major issue I see with Avi's commentary...   It doesn't fit the timeline.

Avi Arad resigned from Marvel Studios in May 2006.   So how does that fit into the time line....

In 2004 Marvel Studios hired David Maisel as COO, because he had a plan to create self funding film studio.   David Maisel was a colleague or friend of Avi Arad depending on which version of history you like.

The self financing deal was signed with Merrill Lynch (insured by AMBAC) in September 2004 with Paramount Pictures as distributing partner.

The rights to Iron-Man reverted to Marvel Entertainment in December 2004 from New Line Cinema (who was the last in a series of companies to hold the rights).   

Brad Grey is name CEO of Paramount Pictures in March 2005.

You starting to see the problems here?

Avi Arad sent another email today to Deadline Magazine this morning...
We had a list of titles, but the slate didn’t have Iron Man or Hulk, and I had a very tough time getting Iron Man back from New Line, but we got it back. I always loved Iron Man. I left because I wanted to leave. It was nothing other than it was time to go. The company was growing and I didn’t like committees and I was 60 and was doing well as it was. I took a walk and thought, ‘I’m too old for this.’ And I thought if I keep nothing but Spider-Man, I will continue with Marvel, but I can do other things. I wanted to do other things … and I am now. The company is in good hands with Kevin who doing a great job.”
And the plot thinkens with a response from NEW LINE Cinema executive:
“The article about the Arad/Feige wars seems interesting, it’s obviously sour grapes from a “producer” who has been marginalized by his former partner Perlmutter.

Arad talks about his “track record.” But what did that entail? All the deals at Fox were done by Bill Mechanic who had the foresight to see that Marvel had more value that previous owner Perelman thought. Iron Man was actually part of the Fox deal and it was simple idiocy by Tom Rothman that allowed New Line to come in and scoop it up. So what track record does he refer to? He deserves no credit for X-Men or Fantastic Four. I am sure he is not clamoring for credit for Daredevil or Elektra. So what track record? Spiderman he claims as his baby, but really that was ALL Sony. They had the rights through some crazyass deals that were done decades ago. He leveraged his way into the deal and pushed for David Fincher to direct the movie, not Sam Raimi. So I guess he had that track record.

But I was moved to write by this sentence of Arad’s - “I knew that we needed it (IRON MAN) so I set out to get it back from Newline and the rest is history.”

Let’s be clear here. Arad was happy to renew Iron Man with New Line for a total of FOUR years. He was happy with a script by Tim McLanies in which Iron Man was dressed by his toaster. He sat in meetings with Bob Shea who insisted that Iron Man not fly and he was okay with that. His vision for Iron Man was to try to pretty much do anything Shea and Emmerich wanted to do.

So how did he get it back from them when the new opportunity arose? Simple. He lied. He lied to New Line and Emmerich for months telling them that they were in negotiations for an extension, leading them to believe the project was going forward, then on the day the option was up he pulled it.

Arad so baldy and boldy lied to everyone back in those days, it’s astonishing he wants the unearned credit now. Track record? Outside of Marvel that consists of the Bratz movie. Feige was and remains the waterboy, that was clear then and now, but to talk about “forgiving” Kevin is just hilarious.

Facts are facts. Arad is full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Sign me,

One Who Walked The Walk”

 I have to say nothing here is looking good for Avi position.

My Ranking of the Marvel Movies - Part 1

Posted by Jeff Labels: , , ,


My Ranking of the Marvel Movies

Movies that I have not seen:

  • Man Thing
Movies that I have not seen in the Theater
  • Punisher: War Zone

I decided to start by breaking down the movies into three categories, Good, Acceptable, Poor and To Be Determined.

So what does Good, Acceptable, Poor and TBD mean to me?
A good movie is one I will put in the Blu-Ray player and actually sit down and watch. 
An acceptable movie is one I will put in the Blu-Ray player and use as background noise while I am doing something else.
A poor movie is one I will put in the Blu-Ray player because I have watched the others and feel guilty that I have not watched but it doesn't stop me from leaving the room.
To be determined are movies that fit into multiple categories for me.

Good Movies
  • X-Men
  • Spider-Man 2
  • X2: X-Men United
  • Thor
  • Captain America: The Winter Soldier
  • The Wolverine
  • Marvel's The Avengers
  • Iron-Man 3
Acceptable Movies
  • Blade
  • Spider-Man
  • Fantastic Four
  • Ghost Rider
  • Spider-Man 3
  • Iron-Man
  • The Amazing Spider-Man 2
  • Thor: The Dark World
  • X-Men: First Class
  • Captain America: The First Avenger
  • Hulk
  • Spider-Man
Poor Movies
  • Blade Trinity
  • Elektra
  • Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
  • Iron-Man 2
  • The Amazing Spider-Man
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
  • X-Men Origins: Wolverine
  • Punisher: War Zone
  • Daredevil

To Be Determined
  • Blade II
  • X-Men: Last Stand
  • The Punisher
The next step is taking a first pass and ranking the movies in each category from worst to best.

After which I went back and slotted my TBD movies.

Poor Movies
  • Punisher: War Zone
  • Elektra
  • Daredevil
  • Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
  • X-Men Origins: Wolverine
  • The Amazing Spider-Man
  • Blade Trinity
  • Iron-Man 2
Acceptable Movies
  • Incredible Hulk
  • Ghost Rider
  • The Punisher
  • Blade II
  • Spider-Man 3
  • X-Men: First Class
  • Fantastic Four
  • The Amazing Spider-Man 2
  • X-Men: Last Stand
  • Blade
  • Spider-Man
  • Iron-Man
  • Captain America: The First Avenger
  • Hulk
  • Spider-Man
  • Thor: The Dark World
Good Movies
  • Iron-Man 3
  • Captain America: The Winter Soldier
  • Thor
  • Spider-Man 2
  • The Wolverine
  • X2: X-Men United
  • X-Men
  • Marvel's The Avengers
Now comes the tough part defending and finalizing my list.

Ranking the Marvel Movies

Posted by Jeff Labels: , , , ,

Wow what a Task!

First let's lay some ground rules, this only includes movies released in 1998 or later, so Howard the Duck is not fair game.
Second you have to actually seen the movie to rank it, it's okay to not rank Man-Thing because you didn't watch it.
Third you have to "defend" your rankings.   What makes __________ a better or worse movie than ______________?

A list of eligible movies in release order:

  • Blade
  • X-Men
  • Blade II
  • Spider-Man
  • Daredevil
  • X2: X-Men United
  • Hulk
  • The Punisher
  • Spider-Man 2
  • Blade: Trinity
  • Elektra
  • Man-Thing
  • Fantastic Four
  • X-Men: Last Stand
  • Ghost Rider
  • Spider-Man 3
  • Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
  • Iron-Man
  • Hulk
  • Punisher: War Zone
  • X-Men Origins: Wolverine
  • Iron-Man 2
  • Thor
  • X-Men: First Class
  • Captain America: The First Avenger
  • Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
  • Marvel's The Avengers
  • The Amazing Spider-Man
  • Iron-Man 3
  • The Wolverine
  • Thor: The Dark World
  • Captain America: The Winter Soldier
  • The Amazing Spider-Man 2
Nice list