Gotham - Review of Pilot Episode

Posted by Jeff Labels:

Adam West as Batman
I am an old school Batman fan.  <Pow> You know the Adam West as Bruce Wayne/Batman, the 3 time Emmy nominated TV show from 1966-68.  <Kapow>  So your mileage may very when it comes to this review. <zing>

On a side note if you ever want to watch an interesting movie on the backstory, issues and shannigans, of a Parody of 1960's tv show, might I suggest watching Return to the Batcave: The Misadventures of Adam and Burt.  

So with my preamble out of the way, time to dig into Fox's Gotham.


Fox ordered 6 episodes of Gotham with a option for an additional 10 episodes for this TV season.  Its a standard operating procedure now-a-days in Hollywood. 

The first show was watched by 8.5 million viewers in the US, not a good number for such a high cost show.  If we assume <bam>yeah I know what happens when you assume<zing> the show has the usual audience lost we are talking 5 million viewers by week six, without increasing its audience no way this show keeps this high of budget.

The pacing of the first episode was poor, could be the lack of a true pilot episode hampered the development team, but it wears out your audience to keep changing pace.

The major problem with Gotham is it suffers from Pre-Sequelitis in every ways shape and form.   As an audience we know what happens to all the characters, its like having been presented with the final chapter or two of a book as a sample on Amazon and than asking us to read the entire book.   Before you say wait its about the journey not the destination, we also know the journey that many of the main characters will be taking along the way.   This means that even though there may be threats against Barbara Keen (James Gordon Fiancée) we know that they will not be followed through on, as she and James get married, have a son (James Jr.) adopt James Niece Babs/Barbara who goes on to become Batgirl, before Barbara Keen-Gordon gets divorced and moves to Chicago.  Talk about dramatic detachment for the audience. 

We know lots of information about the Riddler, Penguin, Falcone, and dozens of other characters things like Selina Kyle (aka Catwoman Catgirl) is potentially the illegitimate child of Carmine Falcone, aka the Roman, I mean the head of Gotham largest crime family, mob-boss.  

Knowing the future also creates another problem for the audience, we know that James Gordon fails to cleanup Gotham City, because without his failure you cannot have the rise of Batman.

In addition its set "too far" in advance of onset of Batman as many potential characters do not arrive on the scene until just before or as Bruce Wayne becomes a vigilante.

Another problem for Gotham is one that the casual viewer may not even pick up on, but a major change in the story line.   Originally the show was supposed to be about James Gordon rise through the ranks of the Gotham City police department as the city falls into corruption and disrepair.   However DC Comics and Fox agreed the show become more of an origin story of everyone.  This would make more sense in Bruce Wayne was a teenager <bam> a la Smallville<pow>.  

Am I the only person who watched the show that thought the skylines of Gotham and Glittery look of the transition scenes looked faked.  I looked it up and yes they are a small scale model fake.   It s also very detaching to have so many, long lasting, versions of the transitions.   Once I started to count there were 10 in the second half show each lasting like five minutes (okay maybe only 5to 10  seconds)  I am guessing we had three to four minutes of these transition scenes total, in a 43 minute show.

One of my pet peeves, the show is set in the late 70's early 80's according to the cars and other items, yet everyone has a "modern cell phone".   I hate to break it to you people but those two things don't go together.  Yeah I will call Dick Tracy, but I mean....

I suspect that we will get all 16 episodes of year one, the show will not get an order for 8-10 additional episodes in year one and will renewed for year two.

X-Men: Apocalypse - News

Posted by Jeff Labels: , , , , ,

Twentieth Century Fox has confirmed, FINALLY, that Bryan Singer will direct the forthcoming X-Men: Apocalypse movie set for release May 27, 2016.

Last month Michael Egan voluntarily withdrew his lawsuit against Bryan Singer in a Hawaiian Federal Court Room.   By withdrawing the case voluntarily Michael Egan still has the opportunity to refile the case at a future date, however I am not sure how the Hawaiian Statute of Limitations works in such case as he filed the original case shortly before the deadline to file such cases.   With that out of the way and Bryan Singer mostly vindicated in the case many believed it was just a matter of time before the announcement occurred.

X-men: Apocalypse is being scripted by Simon Kinberg from a story written by Singer, Kinberg, Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris.  Bryan Singer, Lauren Shuler Donner, Simon Kinberg and Hutch Parker are producing the film. Production is scheduled to begin filming early next year at Mel's Cité du Cinema in Montreal.

James McAvoy (Professor X), Michael Fassbender (Magneto), Jennifer Lawrence (Mystic), Hugh Jackman (Wolverine), Nicholas Hoult (Beast), Evan Peters (Quicksilver) and Channing Tatum (Gambit) have all be confirmed.   In addition younger versions of Jean Grey, Storm and Cyclops will be cast.

James McAvoy has let on that he will be going bald in the movie.

The elder cast including Sir Patrick Stewart (Professor X), Sir Ian McKellan (Magento), Halle Berry (Storm), Famka Jannsen (Jean Grey), James Marsden (Cyclops), Ellen Page (Kitty) amongst others have all indicated a interest in appearing.   Simon Kinberg responded to questions concerning their involvement with "If some of those characters were in the movie we would, but we'll see."

Please note as discussed in a much earlier topic there is already a planed Fox Marvel film for July 13th, 2018 sill have a hunch the Original Cast will return for that date.  I also wouldn't be shocked to see an X-Men film back into the traditional Memorial day weekend slot.

Fantastic Four - Delayed

Posted by Jeff Labels:

Twentieth Century Fox announced that the release date on the Fantastic Four reboot will be moved back from June 15th to August 7th.    In addition Twentieth Century Fox also announced that Assassin's Creed will be delayed until a date to be determined, which is not a good sign for fans of the video game.
The change allows the new Fantastic Four Movie to slip into the same slot the Guardians of the Galaxy had this year. 

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - A Review

Posted by Jeff Labels:

If you are going to go see the latest Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles regardless of what anyone says you can stop reading now, and stop reading all reviews and go waste your money.   


Here's the deal, this is a by the numbers movie, that neither sucks nor rocks but it's a complete waste of money to go see.   In three months you can pick it up on BluRay and watch it in the comfort of you living room for what it costs for one person to go see it with popcorn and skimping on the coke.

What truly works, well the elevator scene is entertaining, probably why the studio released it in multiple promos.  And and well I'd struggled to come up with anything else.

What doesn't work, well the Turtles sense of Geography for starters.   Where else would the sewers of New York end up in a snow covered mountain and the unique landmarks of New York fail to make an appearance.   
The other major things that fails is the constant jokes about how to ridiculous the whole concept of a lab experiment gone wrong is supposed to be.

The rest of the movies issues or workings  just fails to click.   
I guess it's supposed to be funny that every one hits on April O'Neal (Megan Fox) I think at one point she hits on herself, it's just not funny.
Will Arnett improvising on screen for twenty minutes has more potential for laughs than anything that was scripted for him.   The rest of the cast just doesn't click.
The script is beyond outlandish but beyond the fact it's not funny.  
Jonathan Liebesman is hamstrung by CGI limiting he's ability to use steady  cam in similar fashion to Battlefield LA.  The CGI is not bad but no where near the caliber of Lord of Rings or The Avengers and it pulls the movie down.

In the end it's not worth seeing in the theater.


Guardians of the Galaxy - Box Office Prediction

Posted by Jeff

Comparable Movies - $96 million

Competetion - 0
Calander - $10 Million
Movie Fatigue - 0*
Hype - 15%

$106 - $121

Wildcard Statement - Many people have suggested this film be seen in IMAX 3D to get the biggest um bang for the dollar, currently the high water mark on that market is 10%, with this opening in a large number of large format theaters this could easily eclipse that! just shifting the traffic around to more expensive tickets could see $140 million.

The real question is how many new viewers are going to pick this one movie to see, with two a-listers and a professional wrestler as um secondary characters you are going to pick up some fans.

My final prediction is $118 but I won't be shocked to see it go much higher.

Marvel Agents of SHIELD - SDCC Video

Posted by Jeff Labels:


Deadpool Test Footage

Posted by Jeff Labels: ,

The Leaked Deadpool Test footage featuring Ryan Reynolds as the Talkative Hitman.